Re: Start somewhere
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 1:16 am
Thanks Oldfast and flywheel.
I will Amplify the result(12,56,65)
My graphs, except for the reading at 56 are very different looking.
In my mind I was thinking they would be more similar. Is this my lack of taking consistence readings?
Thinking maybe to do another graph with AWL and putting it over the top of the first. Hold them up to the light to see if I get same readings.
It Sure is a lot harder with the back of the lock back in place.
And not knowing the combo.
was wondering If it would be easier to learn manipulation one wheel at a time, like lockpicking(one pin at a time and increase).
Set the combo to 50-50-50(one gate) then graph it(AWL) . Should be easy to spot the gate.
then 25-50-50(two gates) graph it AWL.
then 25-60-50(three gates)graph it AWL.
compare the three graphs.
If any of that makes sense?
Thanks again,
Back to the wheel!
I will Amplify the result(12,56,65)
My graphs, except for the reading at 56 are very different looking.
In my mind I was thinking they would be more similar. Is this my lack of taking consistence readings?
Thinking maybe to do another graph with AWL and putting it over the top of the first. Hold them up to the light to see if I get same readings.
It Sure is a lot harder with the back of the lock back in place.
And not knowing the combo.
was wondering If it would be easier to learn manipulation one wheel at a time, like lockpicking(one pin at a time and increase).
Set the combo to 50-50-50(one gate) then graph it(AWL) . Should be easy to spot the gate.
then 25-50-50(two gates) graph it AWL.
then 25-60-50(three gates)graph it AWL.
compare the three graphs.
If any of that makes sense?
Thanks again,
Back to the wheel!